Thursday, May 28, 2015

AMS selects CrossCheck anti-plagiarism software

After three years of testing, the American Meteorological Society (AMS) announced in February that they will use the CrossCheck anti-plagiarism software to screen all submissions to AMS journals.

Authors may already be familiar with CrossCheck if they’ve published with the American Geophysical Union (AGU). AGU began its CrossCheck implementation in 2010 with two journals, and soon thereafter integrated it for all manuscript submissions. IEEE also began using CrossCheck in 2012 for all prospective content.
In order to minimize variability in interpretation of the CrossCheck results, the AMS established a subcommittee to develop a set of standards and guidelines for plagiarism and self-plagiarism for AMS journal submissions. Plagiarism consists of the fraudulent use of another’s work or ideas and claiming them as your own or without a proper citation. In addition, the AMS also wants to address the growing issue of self-plagiarism. An article from the Association of College & Research Libraries called “Self-plagiarism Perspectives for Librarians” (Rosenzweig and Schnitzer) defines self-plagiarism as,

Duplicate publication, sometimes called self-plagiarism, occurs
when an author reuses substantial parts of his or her own published
work without providing the appropriate references. This can range from
getting an identical paper published in multiple journals, to salami-slicing,
where authors add small amounts of new data to a previously published
paper.”

A brief excerpt from each of the newly clarified policies can be found below. For the entire article on AMS Policy on Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism, please see the AMS website.

1.    On extent: “Duplication of technical words and phrases from other source material amounting to less than a sentence shall not be construed as plagiarism, in general.”
2.    On lengthy or block quotes: “Directly quoted material surrounded by quotation marks or indented as block quotes and cited to the original source is not considered plagiarism.”
3.    On citing conference, gray literature, or otherwise non-peer-reviewed work: “Duplication from a non-peer-reviewed source, provided that it was written by one of the authors of the submission...will not constitute plagiarism, in general”
4.    On changes and duplication: “Duplication of unquoted text (either cited or uncited)- even if the similar text includes changed verb tense, different numerical values, and the use of synonyms, for example-is generally considered to be plagiarism”
5.    On self-plagiarism: “Self-plagiarism occurs when substantial amounts of text previously published by the same author are used without citation and without quotation.” Authors should:
a.    “appropriately cite the original source to promote the primacy of the source”
b.    “indicate that the text largely follows directly from that source”              
6.    On AMS editors: AMS editors maintain the right to determine the next course of action. They can decide when the manuscript needs to be rejected outright with no opportunity for resubmission, author notification with revision requirements, or another course of action.

For further reading:

IEEE CrossCheck Information Page:
Case Report: AGU’s Use of CrossCheck:
CrossCheck powered by iThenticate:
What is Plagiarism?
http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/